Standard global firmware is preferred. Country-specific firmware that locks the regulatory domicile to Indonesia does not achieve the desired outcome, while introducing significant negates. Reasoning:

• Reduces, but does not stop non-compliance.

• Ensuring only certified devices are sold has incomplete impact.

• Devices may easily be brought into the country.

• Country-specific firmware and certification process introduces significant lag.

• Customized firmware, as seen with other vendors, has lag and/or abandonment. Delaying or omitting critical security updates.

• Dynamic compliance determination would potentially require remote calls with negative security implications.

• Compliance should focus on incentive – users choosing to be compliant, because domestic policies provide an optimized level of performance.

• Compliance is already, and increasingly more effectively imposed at the device level. iOS, macOS, Android, Windows, etc.

• Maximized compliance achieved by focusing on permitted hardware categories (indoor AP).

A proper approach to compliance prioritizes addressing the most harmful violations. In the 5 GHz band, the unauthorized use of restricted frequencies for outdoor PTP/PTMP links has led to significant interference with meteorological radar and requires targeted action, specifically focusing on PTP/PTMP equipment. In contrast, indoor APs, even if misconfigured, present a far lower risk. This risk diminishes further in the 6 GHz band due to its higher natural attenuation. With appropriately designed devices, indoor APs pose minimal risk. This creates an opportunity to eliminate country-specific restrictions, enhancing security and accelerating global access to advanced hardware without unnecessary delays.